Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Why isn't end to end the best method for least interference

To: TT TowerTalk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Why isn't end to end the best method for least interference between two 20 m dipoles?
From: Kipton Moravec <kip@kdream.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2018 20:21:02 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Below are the results we did with 2 tuned 20m inverted V dipoles at 35 feet, in 
a test for interference during Field Day.
The results for Orthogonal was the same, independent of which side was 
transmitting.

-------------------------------

With the antennas at ≈ 350 ft apart. An experiment was undertaken to
determine the greatest isolation.
• The source was an HF radio operating at about 5 watts.
• The receiver was a spectrum analyzer.
Antenna 1   Element North/South
Antenna 2   Element North/South
Orientation   Broadside
Received Signal   -5 dBm

Antenna 1    Element East/West
Antenna 2    Element East/West
Orientation    End to End
Received Signal    -10 dBm

Antenna 1     Element East/West
Antenna 2    Element North/South
Orientation    Orthogonal / Perpendicular
Received Signal    -22 dBm

• This as not the expected results. But did show that the optimum
orientation was orthogonal and it did provide about 17 dB of isolation.
• Further testing will be done to determine if these results are
repeatable.

------------------------------

We expected the end to end orientation to have the most attenuation.

Can someone explain why we got what we got?  Is there reference material out 
there that explains this?

Kip
AE5IB

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>