While I’m a new member, I’m all in favor of larger digests.
I receive a number each day from different groups and this one sends out far
more than any other group I belong to.
Just my 2 cents. 73’s,
---
Pete Fawcett, KX2CMC
> On Oct 22, 2017, at 16:18, towertalk-request@contesting.com wrote:
>
> Send TowerTalk mailing list submissions to
> towertalk@contesting.com
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> towertalk-request@contesting.com
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> towertalk-owner@contesting.com
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Digest Length (Wilson Lamb)
> 2. Re: Digest Length (Jim Rhodes)
> 3. Re: Digest size? (Bryan Swadener)
> 4. Re: Digest size? (Jim Rhodes)
> 5. Re: Digest size? (jimlux)
> 6. Re: Digest size? (Bryan Fields)
> 7. Re: Digest size? (Wayne Carlson, K2DT)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:51:51 -0400 (EDT)
> From: "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: [TowerTalk] Digest Length
> Message-ID:
> <2019886604.107021295.1508691111665.JavaMail.root@embarqmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> I'd like the length MUCH longer, so I get one or two/day, max.
> What's wrong with 100K?
> If one wants faster updates, he can choose to get every msg, can't he?
> WL
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 12:11:15 -0500
> From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
> To: Wilson Lamb <infomet@embarqmail.com>
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest Length
> Message-ID:
> <CALhxr4aZovj4jwCronFDqhmKL3qYgh_vYKxoiriBNfH8AS1Hwg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Matters not to me. If it says "digest" on any reflector I just delete.
>
> Jim Rhodes
> K0XU
>
>> On Oct 22, 2017 11:51, "Wilson Lamb" <infomet@embarqmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'd like the length MUCH longer, so I get one or two/day, max.
>> What's wrong with 100K?
>> If one wants faster updates, he can choose to get every msg, can't he?
>> WL
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 17:40:02 +0000 (UTC)
> From: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>
> To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <938590914.2230248.1508694002188@mail.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> And do this too:
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>
> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
> vy 73,
> Bryan WA7PRC
>
> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:24:53 -0500
> From: Clay KY5G
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
>
> Sure..... but I wish we'd have a reminder to trim quotes and sig block
> repeats, et al...
>
>> On 10/21/2017 12:18 PM, k7lxc--- via TowerTalk wrote:
>> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>>
>> I've recently had a request to make the digests larger and was wondering if
>> you're interested in that. The size is currently 30 kb and it's pretty easy
>> to change it. We could try 40 kb for starters or whatever. Your input
>> requested.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Steve K7LXC
>> TT ADMIN
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:13:34 -0500
> From: Jim Rhodes <jimk0xu@gmail.com>
> To: Bryan Swadener <bswadener@yahoo.com>
> Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID:
> <CALhxr4bZ-enS0dU8jVz34UqqpTGkw5L7Sz3qnYAu3VYusb9AWg@mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> I long ago gave up on trying to read anything on posts labeled "digest".
> There were just too many people who replied with the entire digest. So now
> they are automatically deleted. Consequently I don't care. Delete buttons
> are good, filters to delete automatically are better.
>
> Jim Rhodes
> K0XU
>
> On Oct 22, 2017 12:40, "Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk" <
> towertalk@contesting.com> wrote:
>
>> And do this too:
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>>
>> vy 73,
>> Bryan WA7PRC
>>
>> Date: Sat, 21 Oct 2017 12:24:53 -0500
>> From: Clay KY5G
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
>>
>> Sure..... but I wish we'd have a reminder to trim quotes and sig block
>> repeats, et al...
>>
>>> On 10/21/2017 12:18 PM, k7lxc--- via TowerTalk wrote:
>>> Howdy, TowerTalkians --
>>>
>>> I've recently had a request to make the digests larger and was wondering
>> if you're interested in that. The size is currently 30 kb and it's pretty
>> easy to change it. We could try 40 kb for starters or whatever. Your input
>> requested.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Steve K7LXC
>>> TT ADMIN
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 11:27:45 -0700
> From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <49fa768d-2b97-305f-24ff-cdd19a848150@earthlink.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
>
>> On 10/22/17 10:40 AM, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk wrote:
>> And do this too:
>>
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>>
>
>
> I wonder if there are tools that the mailing list software can invoke to
> "auto de-digest" - seems a common enough problem..
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 14:42:29 -0400
> From: Bryan Fields <Bryan@bryanfields.net>
> To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <1a2b82cd-8db7-4240-d36e-5ee0744ead94@bryanfields.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>> On 10/22/17 1:40 PM, Bryan Swadener via TowerTalk wrote:
>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>>
>> than "Re: Contents of TowerTalk digest..."
>
> This still breaks threading.
>
> You need to add the In-Reply-To: headers as well. Mutt will handle this if
> you use the MIME formatted digest, or you can reply via the archives on the
> web.
>
> Granted we're dealing with hams and the proud to be ignorant. I don't hold
> out much hope.
>
> --
> Bryan Fields
>
> 727-409-1194 - Voice
> http://bryanfields.net
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2017 13:18:09 -0700
> From: "Wayne Carlson, K2DT" <k2dt@arrl.net>
> To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Digest size?
> Message-ID: <001d01d34b72$e1b27400$a5175c00$@net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'd be fine getting only one per day, whatever size that takes.
>
> 73, Wayne K2DT
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of TowerTalk Digest, Vol 178, Issue 89
> ******************************************
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|