Ain't it though.
It appears that much of the rewrite was done by person or people who
know nothing about tower, prorogation, or the FAA. I doubt they've seen
the $6 million wrongful death suit awarded for the crop duster who hit a
tower less than 200' and it was painted Red and White. Imagine were it
low visibility.
73, Roger (K8R)I
On 7/28/2017 Friday 12:58 AM, Ken K6MR wrote:
Sure is nice to know we live in the land of the free, isn’t it? ;^(
Ken K6MR
From: Roger (K8RI) on TT<mailto:K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2017 21:46
To: towertalk@contesting.com<mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Here we go again.
A few years back, I wrote about getting involved with the zoning
commission and tower were exempted.
Well, they are at it again. This rime I see a number of places they run
afoul of existing regulations.
For 200' lighting they measure from grade, the FCC measures height above
average terrain.
The township wants minimum visibility while the FAA wants maximum
visibility AND they've made the permitting process a hardship for new
hams. I think they also run afoul of both state and federal tower
regulations.
Gotta get my letters to the ARRL, FAA, and AOPA in the mail / e-mail.
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
73
Roger (K8RI)
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|