Re: [TowerTalk] Snap-on Ferrites

[Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>]

On Sun,6/18/2017 10:06 PM, VE1DT wrote:
> I have again reviewed the tutorial (Rev 6 Dec 2016) and found the paragraph
> that does indeed repeat what you refer to. I thought that basically only the
> material mattered, not the shape. So, if we are comparing #31 toroids to #31
> Clamp-Ons, they are basically going to give about the same results.
I've noted that, in general, impedance is proportional to the length of 
the core that a single turn of the conductor passes through.  And yes, 
this depends upon the material. It also STRONGLY relates to the number 
of turns.  Those relationships are clearly addressed in the tutorial 
(but you've got to STUDY it, not just skim it looking for the answer to 
a narrow question).
> You also "recommend" many Big #31 Clamp-on options for HF usage in your
> cookbook. In fact, there are also other places in the tutorial where the
> clamp-on chokes are discussed and yet none of the sections say that the
> Clamp-On is a poor choice for usage at HF.
I do not share Joe's concerns about the small air gap for clamp-ons that 
are manufactured to very good "flatness" or whatever the correct word is 
to define the perfection with which the mating surfaces can meet. 
Fair-Rite data sheets show very little divergence between clamp-on and 
solid cylinders having the same dimensions. I'd probably change my mind 
if I saw what I believed to be credible data showing that they ARE 
significantly different when they come off the production line. :)
What the article probably was saying (and I haven't read it) is that 
string of beads chokes don't work unless that material is like Fair-Rite 
#73, which is what W2DU correctly chose for his first chokes. Most 
ferrite beads are resonant in the high VHF range. As the tutorial shows, 
an effective choke is self resonant at the frequency where suppression 
is required.
My tutorials develop these concepts. I encourage all to study it. I 
spent a lot of time learning it and writing about it, and I refuse to 
repeat it here for those who are too lazy to study what I've written for 
them! The first tutorial, from 2010, is k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf  Another, 
which ran in National Contest Journal last year, is  
http://k9yc.com/KillingReceiveNoise.pdf  It offers a conceptual 
discussion of how ferrite chokes work in a sidebar.
73, Jim K9YC
>   
>
> In reviewing Appendix 1, I cannot see how the #31 Big Clamp-On is a bad
> choice. The first 4 Manufacturer's Published Data charts in Appendix 1 seem
> to show about the same performance between circular and clamp on cores.
>
>   
>
> Comparing the 2.4" OD toroid against the Big #31 Clamp-On seem to provide
> similar data.
>
> #31 Toroid: Impedance/ESR - 5 turns (Dark red curve) peak at about 1,500
> ohms
>
> #31 Clamp-On: Impedance/ESR - 5 turns (Dark red curve) peaks at about 3,000
> ohms
>
>   
>
> Here's another section where you certainly don't have anything bad to say
> about Clamp-Ons.
>
>   
>
> The Big Clamp-Ons appear to be expensive but they're not - one is roughly
> equivalent to three or
>
> toroids! They are wonderful for portable and Field Day operations, because
> you can easily apply
>
> them to coax without taking the connector off. There is another advantage -
> chokes for 160-40
>
> meters using the Clamp-On weigh about a half pound less than one using
> toroidal cores.
>
>   
>
> Color me confused. Where have I gone astray?
>
>   
>
>   
>
> > Gerald, VE1DT
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
>   
>
> He's absolutely correct. Many times I've posted a link to my tutorial on the
> topic. I spent years learning how this stuff works, and months writing it
> up. I won't repeat it here. Only the link. k9yc.com/RFI-Ham.pdf
>
>   
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>   
>
> On Sun,6/18/2017 7:44 PM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>
> I was reading the recent QST article RF Mayhem by WB8IMY. The author said to
>
> avoid using snap-on ferrites for problems caused by HF signals as they
>
> rarely work well at HF. It is best to stick with circular cores.
>
>   
>
> Is this correct?  I was not aware that snap-ons were less effective.
>
>   
>
> John KK9A
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk