Re 4sq receive vs yagi - which to listen to on 80 and 40.
For my site, it depends a bit on the yagi, heights, and arrival angles.
My 4sq receive, 70' per side, DX Eng, rarely beats the F/S of a 2L 80m
at 156' or the F/S & F/B of the 3L 40m at 140'. The 4sq usually beats
an 86' rotatable 80m dipole at 100'. The RDF numbers suggest this as well.
OTOH, a 40m 2L Moxon at 102' is more often (25%?) bettered by the 4sq.
On 160 it is no contest 4sq vs T vertical, 4 sq to the rescue. With very
high angle noise my 4sq generally does less well although overall it is
a great antenna, RDF seems as advertised.
As Jim(s) note, the best strategy is often to null the noise rather than
aiming azimuth for maximum gain.
Grant KZ1W
On 3/6/2017 9:16 AM, Jim Thomson wrote:
Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:43:32 -0800
From: jimlux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 4-square questions
To my mind, the big advantage of directional antennas on HF is not so
much forward gain, but the fact that they have nulls that can be steered
to block undesired signals.
You can have fairly big phasing errors and the forward gain doesn't
change much (tenths of a dB), but a phasing error can kill the null
depth. I suspect that this is why some people swear by 4-squares and
others swear at them.
## If the 4 sq is used on TX only, any nulls is sorta a moot point.
On a yagi, even with lousy FB or FS, at least they will have a good null
off each side. Usually you dont hear of folks with 80m or 40m yagis,
who also use a dedicated RX ant.
Jim VE7RF
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|