Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Fwd: Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive
From: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 10:20:58 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Where did this come from? Do they have the same right to enter my house and 
empty my liquor supply?

Hans - N2JFS

-----Original Message-----
From: W4AAW Mike Lonneke via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
To: Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Sat, Feb 11, 2017 7:12 am
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd: anti-climb, litigation, attractive



No matter what you do, Judge Robarts will rule that the illegal climber has a 
Constitutional right to trespass and climb your tower.

He will be upheld by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals. You don't have the 
authority to keep trespassers from climbing your tower and, you have not cited 
any examples that show that people who did not climb were not injured!

HI
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>