Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ?
From: "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:36:14 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Yes - I used a F12 Magnum in AZ at 136' and now here in SC at 144'.... it doesn't play particularly well on 160 RX. The Hi-Z is much better. That stated occasionally I'll hear DX quite nicely on it ...

Gary
K9RX



-----Original Message----- From: Jim Thomson
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2017 12:32 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] 80m rotary dipole for 160M RX ?

Has anybody tried using a 80m rotary dipole as a 160M RX ant ? Im thinking it may well be quieter than any dedicated RX ant I could come up with....on a city lot. There is no way I can get adequate separation between any 160m TX ant, like a .25 wave sloper, shunt fed tower,etc, and a 160M RX array. This assumes plenty of Z and esp RS on the 80m 1:1 choke balun... when used for 160M RX. I dont use QSK, just vox. So I would have to incorporate some high speed vac relay setup to swap ants when on 160M RX. It would be interesting to know if the RX concept even works. 80m rotary dipole planned to go up this spring, on the
crankup..at 100 ft.

Jim VE7RF
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>