Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower price increase

To: "towertalk@contesting.com reflector" <TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower price increase
From: Chris <EZRhino@fastmovers.biz>
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:44:57 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Better order from someone else pretty quick...when Tashjian gets wind of this, 
they may raise their prices too!

Chris
KF7P







On Jan 3, 2017, at 10:16 AM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:

> They don't want any Amateur sales. They do not want last minute orders.  They 
> must have landed a large gov't or commercial contract and they want to 
> concentrate on that.
> 
> Circulate a petition?  For what?  They are a private business making business 
> decisions that are best for their business.  I don't think UST owes the ham 
> radio community anything do they? Did we do something special for them?  If 
> you don't like their practices use someone else.
> 
> This opens the door for another company to come in and fill the gap if it 
> makes good business sense.
> 
> Welcome to the world of Capitalism.
> 
> W0MU
> 
> 
> On 1/3/2017 10:08 AM, Ed via TowerTalk wrote:
>> If UST was smart, they would give advance warning of a price increase, with 
>> an effective date. Imagine the number of last-minute sales that would 
>> generate!  To raise prices overnight, shocking even HRO employees clearly 
>> makes no sense.
>> 
>> I'm just glad to have what I already have and am sorry for the hams who do 
>> not. Somebody ought to write a letter to UST and, perhaps even circulate a 
>> petition if there are enough disenfranchised customers.
>> 
>>> On Jan 3, 2017, at 08:43, Grant Saviers <grants2@pacbell.net> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I looked at the Luso150US plus 4.5" dia 5 meter mast in some detail, had 
>>> them do the calcs for the antennas I wanted.  2x 4L 40, 2 x 5L 20, 3L 80 
>>> which is a fairly serious tower loading!  It didn't happen for three 
>>> reasons, a used R65 tower and 9 yagis became locally available cheap, I 
>>> preferred independent rotators (rings or swing arms) and servicing concerns 
>>> with the Luso.  So, I went with a Phillystran guyed R65 tower with K0XG 
>>> rings.  For high wind areas the Luso may be a good choice with its 1 minute 
>>> up/down cycle, if the regulators allow that mode of compliance.
>>> 
>>> In the end the cost difference of Luso vs what I did was small since the 
>>> tower was erected professionally (a 20' section with two rings weighed 
>>> about 1000#) .  The Luso base is a monster, their base plus rebar plus lots 
>>> of concrete. As I understand it, Luso ships in a dedicated 2TEU container 
>>> and ships everything (except the engineer) in it.  Nice slide show of Luso 
>>> install: http://www.7163net.com/k8xs/index.html
>>> 
>>> Flying an engineer from Japan might be cheaper than commercial tower 
>>> riggers here.
>>> 
>>> Grant KZ1W
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 1/3/2017 4:01 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>>>> Luso appears to be a very nice tower but I am not sure that it is only a
>>>> few dollars more than the new UST prices. I have read that they require
>>>> you to fly their engineer from Japan to your site when installing it.
>>>> 
>>>> John KK9A
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> To:    Wayne Kline <w3ea@hotmail.com>
>>>> Subject:    Re: [TowerTalk] US Tower price increase
>>>> From:    Ed via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
>>>> Reply-to:    Ed <navydude1962@yahoo.com>
>>>> Date:    Mon, 2 Jan 2017 21:12:30 -0800
>>>> 
>>>> If you're remotely contemplating a UST, consider a LUSO for just a few
>>>> dollars
>>>> more!
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>> _______________________________________________
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>