Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters

To: <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters
From: "N2TK, Tony" <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2016 13:45:59 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Hi Kelly,
With the F connector it is easier to pull the cable through the conduit, if
I need to. But that is about it. 
N2TK, Tony


-----Original Message-----
From: ve4xt@mymts.net [mailto:ve4xt@mymts.net] 
Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2016 1:17 PM
To: N2TK, Tony <tony.kaz@verizon.net>
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] F to UHF adapters

Hi Tony,

I'd suggest you're best off going with Plan B.

While I'm not a connector conspiracy theorist saying every adapter is evil,
if you don't need an adapter, what's the upside of using one?

73, kelly, ve4xt 

Sent from my iPad

> On Oct 2, 2016, at 11:56 AM, N2TK, Tony <tony.kaz@verizon.net> wrote:
> 
> I use RG6 with male F connectors on my receive antennas and 80M 4-sq. 
> At the Comtek box and receive antenna box, both are covered but 
> outside, I use F-female to UHF-male adapters. Even though they are 
> covered from the elements they corrode and fail.  Could not find an 
> Amphenol adapter in their catalog.
> 
> 
> 
> Does anyone know if there is a good quality adapter out there? If no 
> luck finding a good adapter I can always crimp on PL-259's.
> 
> 
> 
> Tnx
> 
> N2TK, Tony
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>