To: | "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80 |
From: | "Zivney, Terry" <00tlzivney@bsu.edu> |
Date: | Sat, 24 Sep 2016 09:35:50 +0000 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Quick question- why did you chose the to wire of your L to slope toward the tower instead of away, sloping towards the ground? Would you reduce the impact of the tower in the middle by pulling the top wires away from the tower? Rudy N2WQ ******************* Sloping the end of an inverted L downward drops the radiation resistance like a rock! Sloping the end of the inverted L upward raises the radiation resistance. The Effective Height of an inverted L is *** Approximately *** the height of the end of the inverted L. Terry N4TZ _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80, Jeff AC0C |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] FW: US Tower gearbox, Matt |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80, RT Clay |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 4 square for 80, Steve London |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |