Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] 6-meter antenna height

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] 6-meter antenna height
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2016 01:50:04 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
FD operation got me to thinking about this.

On HF (depending on band conditions) there is a statistically preferred height for the distance to be worked.

On VHF particularly 6-meters where long haul is Sporadic E, Tropo, occasionally F, or Aurora.

Local work is usually the higher the better. I've normally had the 7L C3i (boom just a few inches short of 30 feet) at 115 feet and excellent results for single and double hop Sporadic E as well a F and Au.

Keeping in mind that the ideal height for HF is statistically derived, where is the point (frequency) where we should typically be switching over from the way we figure HF antenna height to the higher the better? The FD station had their 6-meter antenna height calculated the same way we usually figure HF antenna height, meaning, I could about jump high enough to touch the antenna. That is, if I could still jump. They were shooting through the trees.

A typical 6-meter antenna would have a "bunch" of lobes between the horizon and vertical

--

73

Roger (K8RI)


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>