| To: | towertalk@contesting.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams? | 
| From: | Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> | 
| Reply-to: | Dave Thompson <thompson@mindspring.com> | 
| Date: | Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:01:57 -0400 (GMT-04:00) | 
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> | 
| I thought the spiderbeam sold by Vibroplex was a better antenna than most of the other hex beams. Why? 1. It is a 3 el beam on 20 and 15 and a 4 el beam on 10. I guessed that it was a 2 el beam on 17 and 12. 2. It only requires 4 spreaders not 6 like most hex beams. I was somewhat surprised that the model supplied by K5VV was lower in gain and the pattern was so poor on 20/15/10 but then again I have not seen other hex beams modeled. 73 Dave K4JRB _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams?, Patrick Greenlee | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 163, Issue 87, Arnie Pfingst | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Any thoughts on spider-beams?, Dan Maguire via TowerTalk | 
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Force 12 XR3-NV Plus, Jeff Draughn | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |