To: | "'tower'" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system |
From: | "StellarCAT" <rxdesign@ssvecnet.com> |
Date: | Wed, 13 Jan 2016 14:03:03 -0500 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Please forgive me - I'm not saying its bad practice or one shouldn't do it -
just trying to understand why.
Lets differentiate between what is always said "you need to connect the two together" and WHY you need to do it. Again - if there is a long distance except as a DC ground most any kind of connection is going to be a poor if not non-connection at RF! So why do it? There will be minimal current through it - especially if you've done your job at the tower where there is a much lower impedance path to ground. Its not going to take the higher impedance path (or of course it will but in proportion to the impedances seen) just because its there. I don't see a reason why other than DC ground.Now there is a case if it serves as a radial from the tower - but even then - even if a good path most of the energy will be dissipated at the tower. If you have a single point ground at the service entrance (which again isn't the greatest from a lightning standpoint unless you're connecting at the poles ground - which my pole has a #4 wire at best from the top to the ground) .... and you bring the shack ground connections - lets assume they're all 0 impedance in the shack for discussion sake - if you bring that to this same point then if there are no currents through the control cables/coax then the shack will "float" with the service ground - and there will be no voltage differentials nor currents IN the shack... but 0 impedance through the coax/cables? So.... seeing a clearer picture here... lightning strikes the tower - the voltage at the base of the tower and the ground in immediate contact will go up and reduce as a factor of distance from the base... so if the cables are elevated to that voltage now there is a voltage differential between that end and the shack... current flows... if at the shack the voltage established reference to the DC ground is higher than at the service entrance (through the earth between it and the tower base - assuming no connection) ... then indeed you're going to have the likelihood of a problem. Adding a connection will act 'better' than the earth in reducing that voltage differential between the service entrance and the tower base... but its all relative! How much more is the question - especially when, once again, its hundreds of feet away. Gary _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system, jimlux |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system, Roger (K8RI) on TT |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system, Gary Schafer |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Grounds, 'remote' towers, 'house' power system, jimlux |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |