Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] guy posts math

To: Bill Aycock <baycock@mediacombb.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] guy posts math
From: Kelly Taylor <ve4xt@mymts.net>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 11:57:02 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I’m pretty sure the 20-foot utility poles in many neighborhoods are not 80 feet 
long. (Three feet down for every one foot up would be 60 feet buried and 20 
feet in the air.)

I could see 20/3 (6.66 feet) as the required depth but not 3/20.

That being said, even if Lee did get the correct formulas, is he the best 
person to ascertain the variables that need to go into them? Certainly some of 
the variables can simply be taken as fact (wind speed rating, weight of tower, 
weight of antennas, total windload, etc.). But the one that is perhaps most 
critical requires testing and experience: soil quality. 

All of this is weighed against risk: if the tower is in the middle of nowhere 
and isn’t going to hit anybody or anything on the way down, your risk is 
considerably less than if something valuable lies within the fall radius.

If it’s the latter, then you need to consider at least the minimum of what your 
insurance company would demand as an acceptable manner of mitigating risk. I 
wouldn’t be surprised if the insurer’s response to a claim isn’t “Show me the 
wet-stamp…”

73, kelly
ve4xt 

> On Jul 19, 2015, at 11:11 AM, Bill Aycock <baycock@mediacombb.net> wrote:
> 
> Lee-
> Don't be so touchy; The first sentence of Bills post was the only answer you 
> need.
> There is NO "Formula" for designing an elevated guy post; it involves too 
> many variables and options. Because there are many options, a trained, 
> experienced specialist is required.
> BTW- Your "Rule of thumb" for wooden poles seems to be inverted, to me.  Can 
> you tell me where you found that?
> Bill--W4BSG
> 
> -----Original Message----- From: ak4qa
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2015 4:33 PM
> To: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
> Cc: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] guy posts math
> 
> 
> If you read my message, the formula that I am asking for includes those 
> variables.
> 
> Not trying to be snarky but I am a engineer, just not a structural engineer.
> 
> You may have just been trying to be helpful and the texting may have not 
> communicated that. However your response seemed a bit condescending.
> 
> I am fully aware of railroad rails being used but I do not want to make a 
> educated guess.
> 
> Again, let me reiterate looking for the 'formula' so no guess work is 
> involved.
> 
> 73,
> Lee
> AK4QA
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Cqtestk4xs@aol.com
> Date:07/16/2015  2:41 PM  (GMT-06:00)
> To: ak4qa@msn.com
> Cc: TOWERTALK@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] guy posts math
> 
> Suggest you contact an engineer.  Wood is a far different material than 
> whatever you are using.  Variables include:  diameter of the pipe, thickness 
> of the wall, whether the interior is filled with concrete and rebar. Anything 
> you might come up on your own is an educated guess at best .  I'm not a big 
> fan of guessing on a 100 ft tower.
> 
> Some guys use a steel girder as the post.
> 
> Bill K4XS/KH7XS
> 
> In a message dated 7/16/2015 7:24:58 P.M. Coordinated Universal Time, 
> ak4qa@msn.com writes:
> Does anyone have a the formula for guy posts?
> I have a friend that wants tall guy posts (7 feet) for a 100 foot tower so he 
> can walk under them.  I need to show him the stress that is involved in that 
> as opposed to 2 feet out of the ground.
> I've always used the wooden pole rule of thumb; for every foot up you need 3 
> feet down.
> Also, if you have the calculation for    the back guy (i.e. earth screws) 
> well my friends, that would be gravy on my biscuit!
> All the best and
> 73,LeeAK4QA
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk 
> 
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> http://www.avast.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>