On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:33 PM, Roger (K8RI) on TT <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net
wrote:
[-SNIP-]
A crank up and fold over for a given height and antenna wind area, is
larger, much heavier has a lot of moving parts and requires one humongous
chunk of concrete for a base compared to a guyed tower. However the XYL
might prefer the expense to having guy anchors around the yard.
73 Roger (K8RI)
Note on safety for tilt-over configs, unless you have one of those setups
that continuously holds the beam plane horizontal, as the tower is tilted
over, there are still plenty of access problems to deal with. There are
numerous pix in ham mags, and in YouTubes, showing hams precariously on
*stepladders*, with zero fall protection, working on their 'accessible'
antennas. You can't belt onto a stepladder....
Don N7EF
On 7/2/2015 6:40 PM, Big Don wrote:
Before summarily blowing off a guyed configuration, it would be worth
browsing thru the TowerTalk Archives for all the problems folks have had
with winches, cables, pulleys, coax pinches/tangles/fatigue, sections
jammiing, including unhappy motor electronics (today's stuff).
http://lists.contesting.com/_towertalk/
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
http://www.avast.com
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk