Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Long pole / simple, tall construction for small antenna

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Long pole / simple, tall construction for small antenna
From: Herbert Schoenbohm <herbert.schoenbohm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2015 15:32:23 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Consider small telephone poles...sometimes the used ones that are damaged or compromised by the ground can be sawed off, treated, and replanted with successful results. Expect to pay about $150 for the turn key price of the digger truck and delivery, including the surplus pole for a 30 footer.


Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ

On 10/27/2014 8:38 AM, ve4xt@mymts.net wrote:
Hi

I think your solution is financial, not mechanical.

Sign up customers needing towers with a fixed-term contract into which you 
incorporate the cost of the tower into the monthly rate.

Here, some wireless broadband providers set a monthly rate assuming everyone 
needs a tower and build the cost of the towers into their business plan.

You also need to talk to your insurance provider. Not sure how tort law works 
in Norway, but here, a tower failure without liability insurance could be a 
fatal blow to the business. That insurance would also have to be built in to 
the business model.

Kelly
ve4xt

Sent from my iPhone

On Oct 27, 2014, at 6:02, "Vegard Svanberg" <vegard@svanberg.no> wrote:

Thanks, all!

Really helpful.

I'll post back when I've something up running.

* Vegard Svanberg <vegard@svanberg.no> [2014-10-26 16:54]:

Hi guys,

I work in broadband and from time to time we have customers we want to
hook up, but we're unable to gain a free line of sight from the customer
to the nearest tower.

There must be a free LOS, which means no trees, branches, mountains,
buildings etc.

The most problematic cases are when people live in areas surrounded by
trees.

Since cost is an issue here, we can't build towers for each and every
one. But I'm considering a low cost solution to get the antenna higher
in the air - often as much as 20 meters (about 65-70 feet) is required
to gain proper LOS.

So... I'm considering making a simple, cheap and tall construction.
I've been pondering either just putting together cheap and thin
aluminium tubes with guyings to stiffen the construction, or have
someone make something for me in composite materials. For instance poles
I can insert into one another to get the length (height) I need, also
here with guyings.

Apart from the pole itself, an issue is also proper anchoring in the
ground (rocky ground is easy, obviously, while sandy and muddy soil
could be tricky).

The weight of the antennas are only about 400 grams and the surface area
is small (HxW = ~300 x ~80 mm) so we're talking pretty light and simple
stuff here.

Before I go ahead and start constructing this myself, I was just
wondering if someone here has done something similar before, or know
someone who sell ready-made kits I can buy.

Thanks!

--
Vegard Svanberg <vegard@svanberg.no> [*Takapa@IRC (EFnet)]

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
--
Vegard Svanberg <vegard@svanberg.no> [*Takapa@IRC (EFnet)]

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: [TowerTalk] Long pole / simple, tall construction for small antenna, Herbert Schoenbohm <=