Brian, I would not rule out a free standing tower esp since you need to
stay under 30'.
I have several self-supporting Universal towers here, each of which uses
as their first 3 sections, their 30" HD series sections. When
assembling the towers and after getting those first 3 sections up in the
air, you realize how strong that structure is.
In your case, since you mentioned 24', I would use two 30" HD sections.
See if you can get the top section modified either by Universal or by a
local welding/fab place to make it a topper with a collar where you can
then use a 2" or 2.5" mast. My gut tells me that two 30" HD sections
with a 4'-5' mast will still be standing long after your home is leveled
from some severe wind storm.
Gedas, W8BYA
Gallery at http://w8bya.com
Light travels faster than sound....
This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
On 2/12/2015 1:03 PM, Brian Carling wrote:
Many thanks Bud.
I will need to review which version they are using. Yes I had someone pointing
me in the direction of a freestanding tower but I think I may go to using guys.
It's either that or trade my tower sections in on a stronger better built
freestanding tower designed for that purpose. I only need about 24 to 28 feet
in height. Maximum.
Best regards - Brian Carling
AF4K Crystals Co.
117 Sterling Pine St.
Sanford, FL 32773
Tel: +USA 321-262-5471
On Feb 12, 2015, at 12:27 PM, W2RU - Bud Hippisley <W2RU@frontiernet.net> wrote:
On Feb 12, 2015, at 9:58 10AM, bcarling@cfl.rr.com wrote:
I am putting together a permit application with my city which requires
certfication for 139 mph
for three second gusts as in TI-222 spec. Also steady 100 or 110 mph I think.
We are making a 30 foot Rohn 25G tower according to the Rohn specification with
4 foot
cube base of concrete with no guys.
I’m not sure I understand what you’re hoping to find.
My 4-year old Rohn catalog makes it VERY clear that 30 feet of Rohn 25 can hold only 1.7 sq.
ft. of added antenna when the environment is 90 mph (ANSI/EIA-222 Rev. E) and NO ICE. (For
areas that experience icing, Rohn 25 is specified by the manufacturer at ZERO sq. ft. of
additional antenna load!) From your e-mail address and the wind speeds you mention,
I’m going to guess you’re in Central Florida, and I daresay a 90-mph Rohn
EIA-222 Rev. E specification is not going to be adequate for your city.
Nowhere in your posting do you mention what total antenna, rotator, feedline, etc.
wind surface area or wind load you anticipate putting on this tower. But my guess is
that NO freestanding 30’ Rohn 25 tower is going to make the grade.
Also, you fail to mention which version of TIA/EIA-222 your city is using. The latest
I’m aware of is Rev. G — a substantial revision from previous methods of
specifying wind loading.
Bud, W2RU
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|