Doug,
Thanks for the contact in 160m Contest. I was ZF2DX that weekend.
.05 = 1/20 but VE7RF, for some reason, calculated a half wavelength instead of
a wavelength and then divided by 10 instead of 20, so his end number is
correct. Whether .05 wavelength height works well or not, for practicality I
can't imagine anyone putting up a Beverage that is 500-1000 feet long and
having it up 25 feet or so when it is likely to work better at a practical
height of 6-8 feet.
73...Stan, K5GO
Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 2, 2015, at 4:50 AM, Doug Turnbull <turnbull@net1.ie> wrote:
>
> Dear OMs,
> Another point to consider is that while 13 feet might be okay for 160M,
> it is too high for 80 and 40 meters.
> 73 Doug EI2CN
>
> 0.05 = 1/20
>
>
> ## JI claims that max beverage height should be .05 wavelength.
> That implies 26.86 feet. 492 / 1.832 = 268.55 feet.
> 268.55 / 10 = 26.86 feet.
>
> ## It would be interesting to know if you could use an existing
> 6 ft tall fence line and strap a 8-15 ft tall pvc tube to each
> wooden fence post. At that height, it would be a bitch to install
> the beverage wire. An orchard ladder might work.
>
> Jim VE7RF
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|