Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Adding 160 to an 80M dipole?
From: RLVZ--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to: RLVZ@aol.com
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:46:34 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
For 160-m. I agree with John's statement below, unless the  vertical is 
real short and base loaded in which case I'd prefer a low  Dipole or Inverted 
Vee on if there's no better option such as a top  loaded vertical, Shunt Fed 
tower, or a Slant L.  Example: one of the  first year's I came to Florida, I 
mounted a very short 20' base loaded vertical  at the edge of a salt water 
river that had line-of-sight  over salt-water to a large area I was trying 
to work.  I also had  a low Inverted Vee for 160-m. with apex at 50' and ends 
at 20'.  I  thought the short vertical would do better on DX, but the short 
vertical was down 10-20dB in every case.  
 
73, Dick- K9OM
 
 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 12/17/2014 10:22:52 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
john@kk9a.com writes:

I never  had much success using a low dipole, even from the Caribbean. For
me a  short vertical with a minimal ground system worked better and it used
much  less real estate.

John  KK9A



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>