Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter antenna thoughts.

To: Tower Talk <TowerTalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 160 meter antenna thoughts.
From: Richard Solomon <dickw1ksz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 17:43:54 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Beverages are nice if you have lots or real estate. But for those land-
locked folks, a Pennant Antenna works well. If you got the room, 2
of them, back-to-back work even better.

73, Dick, W1KSZ

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> wrote:

> ------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped)
>
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2014 08:20:40 -0800, Jim wrote:
>
> >
> >Horizontal antennas below about a half wave are cloud-warmers. I had one
> >at 120 ft, and my vertical nearly always beat it, often by a LOT.
>
> REPLY:
>
> True if you're working DX, but for local Qs out to a few hundred miles
> or so a cloud warmer is what you want. 160 meters nearly always
> reflects vertical incidence signals. One of the best bands there is
> for that distance.
>
> And if you're serious about DX on 160 don't stop with a vertical. Get
> a four square and a Beverage.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>