Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ repairs

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] MFJ repairs
From: David Gilbert <xdavid@cis-broadband.com>
Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2014 12:00:21 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

So very true. In fact, I've always felt that at least part of the reason that MFJ ended up with those companies that K1QX thinks MFJ "saved" was because they couldn't compete with decent products against the inferior ones that MFJ put out at lower prices. Anyone seriously think that MFJ's products were better quality than the pre-MFJ ones from those other companies?

Again, MFJ has been successful because they serve the market as it exists in general ... one that overall is not very discerning and which values price over all else.

73,
Dave   AB7E



On 9/1/2014 11:05 AM, Jim Brown wrote:

As someone who has made a living in technical sales, I see another negative to their operation -- they pollute the market for products of moderate cost but better quality. That makes it that much more difficult for a company to enter the market with a competing product, when what APPEARS to be an equivalent is heavily advertised at a much lower cost.

73, Jim K9YC


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>