| To: | towertalk@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke |
| From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 May 2014 22:21:53 +0100 |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Jim,I don't disagree - I just don't consider a "Q" of 1.3 to be particularly high for a choke! Steve G3TXQ On 19/05/2014 22:08, Jim Lux wrote: I think the take home thing here is that when it's a "choke" you're looking for, then you want fairly broadband and lossy. If it's a "notch filter" you want, then resonance is fine. I would guess that most antenna applications are more the "broadband choke" than the "narrowband notch". _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mast/tower design close in guyed by shrouds and spreaders?, Jim Lux |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Mast/tower design close in guyed by shrouds and spreaders?, Patrick Greenlee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke, Jim Lux |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Common-mode choke, Jim Brown |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |