Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Poor eHam reviews of the AV 480

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Poor eHam reviews of the AV 480
From: "Roger (K8RI) on TT" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 16:21:31 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 4/12/2014 3:11 PM, K7LXC@aol.com wrote:
  With only three reviews, the AV-680 suffers because of one  bad review
for an issue (MFJ/Hy-Gain quality control) that has no bearing on  the
antenna's performance.

With center fed half wave slopers on 40 with the top end at 90 feet and an angle of 45 degrees against an AV640 mounted at 25 feet well away from any nearby objects, through an AB switch. At times the difference was remarkable, but not always for the same antenna.IOW This was true when working DX, be it Europe, Africa, Asia, or Oceania. At times, but not very many, they were equal

Typically a plain old dipole or inverted V with the apex at 90 feet would out do either for stateside.

I would assume (which is never safe) that I'd get similar results with the AV680.

73

Roger (K8RI)

For real live on-the-air performance, you can't beat our vertical
comparison test. While we didn't test the AV-680  specifically, there is enough
real data and protocol that you should be able to  make some educated
inferences from the info in the report. And only twenty bucks  + postage from
_www.championradio.com_ (http://www.championradio.com) .
Cheers,
Steve     K7LXC
TOWER TECH
and
Champion Radio Products
2067-890-4188

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>