I don't disagree with the trends you describe, but I think you may have
the ramifications backward. I am friends with the proprietors of a
local wireless ISP, and they tell me that BECAUSE of all those increased
regulatory concerns the FCC is actually encouraging the use of existing
towers ... including amateur radio towers ... for such modest commercial
ventures instead of proliferating more of them.
Each situation needs to be evaluated on its own and some of the
extrapolations I've read in this thread don't make much sense.
73,
Dave AB7E
On 1/22/2014 6:40 PM, Bill Jackson wrote:
All,
I am not a Telecommunications Lawyer and I did not sleep at a Holiday Inn
Express last night, but I offer up these thoughts for consideration.
Many of the privileges we enjoy as Amateur Radio Operators are the result of
our consistent stance is that we are a not for profit, non commercial radio
service. This has resulted in the waiver of many of the regulatory
processes that commercial entities must comply with in order to install and
maintain wireless communications infrastructure. In my own case, I was able
to install my "dream" antenna farm with only a simple application for a
building permit because I was able to truthfully say that my tower was to be
used strictly for my hobby and in no way would generate any revenue for
myself or any other commercial entity. This enabled me to bypass the normal
process of going before the County Planning Commission and County Board of
Supervisors to obtain approval.
Anyone who works in the wireless industry knows that there is an ever
increasing amount of regulation at the federal, state and local levels. For
instance, the latest wrinkle is the FCC is now tying the National
Environmental Policy Act into any commercial license application that
involves an antenna structure. For the moment, the interpretation by the
FCC is that any newly licensed antenna support structure such as a tower or
even a simple pole is subject to a full blown environmental and
archeological assessment costing thousands of dollars before construction
can begin.
My concern is that hosting a commercial entity on a structure that was
originally permitted and built under the guise that it is a non-commercial
antenna structure may be construed as a shrewd way of getting around the
regulations, with the end result being more regulation of antenna structures
that are intended solely for Amateur radio use.
Please consider what ramifications the agreement you are making with the
commercial entity may have on the next ham in your community who wants to
put up a tower on his property.
Thanks and 73
Bill Jackson, K9RZ
Washington County, Nebraska
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|