Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Interesting development

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Interesting development
From: Pete Smith N4ZR <n4zr@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2013 14:10:48 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I think you'll be wasting your time with the Stackmatch, unless you adjust the feedline lengths to compensate for the different positions of the driven elements relative to your target directions. WX0B wrote a little article about doing this - probably somewhere on the AS web site.

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 10/1/2013 12:36 PM, W5XB wrote:
Yes Doug, I am sure I was on the Force...after my “oops” on Saturday morning....I 
checked—twice. When you home the Steppir elements, there is NO signal, not even noise—hihi.

Ian, I think you have the best explanation—some kind of coupling...I forgot to add, when I 
selected the Force it was at 045, the Steppir on the roof was at 010...so they were 
“close” to the same direction.

After this development, I am putting the Steppir on top at 67 ft, and the Force 
35 ft below and actually couple them with an Array Solutions stack match and 
see how that develops...while working on getting a big tower, or Bertha up with 
stacked Steppers at 150 and 75.

73s,

Grant
W5XB
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>