Hi Mark
I do understand a lot about the FL SJ habits since I have been forced by
this situation to learn about it. The interesting notes are that:
1) There are no scrub oaks within at least 1,000 ft. and the US FWS buffer
zone around suspect properties is specified to be 850 ft.
2) There were no birds heard/sighted within my 850 ft buffer zone by the
surveyor
3) The natural predator is the hawk and the hawk perches in high trees with
a good view of the ground. All of the properties in my buffer zone are
populated with Heritage Oaks that are huge and tall plus Brazillian Pepper
trees which the SJ just does not nest in plus thick vines in between all
other growth.
4) One area of my buffer that the FWS pointed to was a southerly direction
where there was a sighting in 2007 by the same surveyor that did my lot. The
surveyor indicated that the flight path of the bird was to exit the region
further to the south and totally away from my lot. Now, the FWS had no
problem accepting that data point in 2007 but will not accept a recent,
fresh data point 6 years later that indicates no birds.
So, anyplace within 1,000 ft of my property is NOT quality SJ habitat. The
problem is that the FWS simply refuses to acknowledge that the survey is
negative and therefore the birds MUST be there without verifying the survey,
even by another independent surveyor.
The method for finding birds is to playback a tape of the birds in a certain
pattern around the property out to 850 ft. These birds are very friendly
and will come to you if they hear the recording. They will land on your
shoulder. They rarely fly much above 8 ft. height , maybe onto a power line
if they really need a bird's eye view.
This process is repeated for 5 days from 1 hr after Sunrise to about 11 AM
due to air temps getting warm by 11 AM. Overall, it is a 30 hour process for
5 days.
It seems to me that if FWS was really concerned about the survival of these
birds, they would be putting in more effort to know where they are nested
and where they are NOT nested rather than just assuming. It is easier to
just sit back in their chair and just make blanket statements based on old
data and wait for retirement.
I am an animal lover. I will not drive over the diamond back rattler in my
road and I stop driving to get out and move a gopher turtle out of the road
lest it get run over by some bonehead. These animals all have a purpose on
this earth and it is not my intention to upset that balance. But anyone who
lives here knows about the SJ situation and how ridiculous the management of
them has become.
Best Regards
Dan Schaaf
=================================
K3ZXL www.k3zxl.com
60 Meters www.60metersonline.net
=================================
NOBSKA www.nobska.net
Cape Cod Instruments www.gnm-inc.com
Tel: 941-766-0706
Fax: 941-766-0707
=================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Beckwith
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2013 1:08 PM
To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Territorial birds
[Thread change alert - grew out of discussion of scrapping military tower
trailers]
Dan, with all respect, I think you might be confused on one point.
these are just sightings, not nests. The birds fly from the nest and back
to it. They are very territorial.
It reads like you are trying to make the argument that even though the
Florida Scrub-Jays are seen, it does not necessarily mean their nests are
nearby.
What you may not know is that birds generally establish their "territory"
(and defend it, i.e. "they are very territorial") as the buffer zone around
their nest. They have to be close enough to respond quickly to any threat
to the nest coming from any direction. This means that if you see them,
then, by definition, their nests *are* nearby. Which I think is the US Fish
and Wildlife point. I would say you are in a position with considerable
downside potential, and if it were me I would be working on Plan B = sell
the property to a bird lover who has $54K he's willing to invest in the
future of Florida Scrub-Jays.
Yes, I understand the survey you acquired concluded the birds were not
nearby. You're in a pissing contest with the federal government who thinks
their survey is better than your survey. Good luck with that. It is not
fair. You are absolutely right about that.
I do very much appreciate how absurd it seems that they would take your $54K
and not use it in any way that you could see it, and still, as you say,
allow you to then "bulldoze the nests." That's almost as dumb as scrapping
perfectly good tower trailers. The Endangered Species Act, which protects
Florida Scrub-Jays, is not a perfect law (is there such a thing?) and is
particularly infamous for being hijacked for political and societal reasons
like your case-in-point. There is obviously enough oak scrub to support the
Florida Scrub-Jay population, especially if there are so few of the birds as
they claim. Plus, trust me, the birds are smart enough to find it and move.
It's what they do.
Full disclosure: I am a bird enthusiast who also has a bunch of towers, but
not in a state that is as environmentally overboard as Florida. Yes, the
Endangered Species Act is a federal deal, but for some reason we don't hear
too much about it where I live.
73
Mark, N5OT
P.S. Sorry I took too many contrarian pills this morning by accident.
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|