Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on Tower lifting cable broken strands

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Thoughts on Tower lifting cable broken strands
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:10:45 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 8/22/13 10:16 AM, Grant Saviers wrote:

There are standards for when a wire rope should be replaced, one from OSHA
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_table=STANDARDS&p_id=34


another at
http://www.grainnet.com/articles/Inspecting_Wire_Ropes-10905.html

As I read this guidance, you absolutely need to replace the cable,
particularly since the breaks are so close together.



Yes, if you're using it in an occupational setting, or if you want the conservative approach.

However, hams do things that are "unsafe" from an occupational or workplace regulatory standpoint all the time. They just have higher risk than is considered acceptable for workplaces.

For instance, at my workplace, standing on the top 3 steps of a ladder is not supposed to be done. But an awful lot of people stand on higher steps at home, accepting the risk (and the inevitable injuries that result).

How many people have safety railings and restraints on their roof when they go up to work on antennas? What about in their back yard? I have a retaining wall in my backyard that is about 5 ft high, and you can walk on the fill above the wall, and there's no safety railing.

How many people lift more than 55 lb by themselves without using a lifting device (e.g. that 60 pound sack of concrete, or a 100 pound bale of hay, or changing a tire)?

I would venture that very few recreational rock climbers are compliant with occupational fall protection standards.

It is good that we discuss the usual standards, but they have a time and place. And, in particular, for someone who cannot evaluate the relative risk, regulatory limits are a valuable check point.

But part of what this mailing list is all about is to discuss the relative risks, and create knowledgeable users who can make those sort of judgement calls. The going in assumption is that only YOU is going to be affected by the judgement, of course. I think all of us tend to take a more conservative standard when doing work for someone else, than when doing it for yourself. Folks who have come out on the unfortunate side of the decision personally also tend to be more conservative. Age has a lot to do with it. There are things I did in my 20s that I would not do now, 30 years later.




_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>