Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Multiple Rigs switch isolation .

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Multiple Rigs switch isolation .
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 26 May 2013 12:05:09 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 5/26/13 11:06 AM, johne tds.net wrote:
I just checked a multiple rig switch port that would connect on to the
other  HF radio and with the other HF rig keyed up  (500w cw) I did measure
500 ma on the  section of coax that would go to the other rig. I am worried
about the isolation of the two HF rig's. Any better way to check this ? or
is the 500ma ok ? The switch is a ice 512-12 antenna switch.



half an amp? or half a watt? Into what kind of load?

30dB isolation (500W on one port, 500 mW on the other) isn't bad for a relay, although not that great for a switch. 500 mW (+27dBm) is a lot of power to be putting into a receiver antenna port, though..


the ICE website doesn't seem to give an isolation spec, but, for instance, MFJ manual switches are 50-60dB, and the coax relays from DowKey typically are 80-85 dB below 1 GHz. (MFJ doesn't give any specs on the RCS-8V)


I suspect that people tend to use these switches with one transceiver and multiple antennas, so having crummy isolation isn't a big deal. 30dB would be plenty in that application.

For a multiple rigs to multiple antennas, you might want a design that has two relays in series (figuring you probably get around 30dB/relay, if the layout isn't bad).

The DowKey relays, internally, are pretty sophisticated, with a lot of attention to good isolation.

With a conventional AC/DC power relay (as used in the RCS-8V, for instance) you've got leakage from capacitive coupling across the relay, as well as through the coil.
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>