| To: | "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox |
| From: | John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com> |
| Reply-to: | John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 9 May 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (PDT) |
| List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Thanks to the great folks who shared their knowledge and experience with Nolaox and Penetrox. I m satisfied that Noalox will perform well and will use it. I really appreciate all the great replies. Very helpful. 73, John, K5PGW _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??, Bill Marx |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Alfaspid acoustic noise?, Jerry Gardner |
| Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??, John King |
| Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Email test - Please ignore, Tom H Childers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |