To: | "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox |
From: | John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com> |
Reply-to: | John King <k5pgw@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Thu, 9 May 2013 10:42:51 -0700 (PDT) |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Thanks to the great folks who shared their knowledge and experience with Nolaox and Penetrox. I m satisfied that Noalox will perform well and will use it. I really appreciate all the great replies. Very helpful. 73, John, K5PGW _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??, Bill Marx |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Alfaspid acoustic noise?, Jerry Gardner |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Noalox versus penetrox ??, John King |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Email test - Please ignore, Tom H Childers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |