Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC
From: David Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 15:22:10 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
How high would "high enough" be?
-- 
Thanks,
Dave
For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see:
http://www.nk7z.net



On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 13:41 -0400, john@kk9a.com wrote: 
> I agree that a vertical dipole is a poor antenna, however he said "with a
> center vertical dipole"
> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00186.html
> . If he has a high enough support for a vertical dipole array, he is
> probably better of with a horizontal wire beam, but that was not his
> question.
> 
> 
> To:   towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject:       Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC
> From:  Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Reply-to:     jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
> Date:  Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:38:57 -0700
> 
> 
> On 4/18/2013 9:33 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> I would start with modeling a single vertical dipole.
> 
> Actually, a simple quarter wave vertical is much easier to model, and is
> close to what he wants to build. And there's am example model of it with
> the simple version of EZNEC that comes on the CD with the ARRL Antenna
> Book. Besides -- vertical dipoles are not great antennas because their
> vertical patterns are poor for most uses.
> 
> 73, Jim K9YC
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>