How high would "high enough" be?
--
Thanks,
Dave
For Amateur Radio equipment reviews and setups see:
http://www.nk7z.net
On Thu, 2013-04-18 at 13:41 -0400, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> I agree that a vertical dipole is a poor antenna, however he said "with a
> center vertical dipole"
> http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/Towertalk/2013-04/msg00186.html
> . If he has a high enough support for a vertical dipole array, he is
> probably better of with a horizontal wire beam, but that was not his
> question.
>
>
> To: towertalk@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] EZNEC
> From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
> Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 09:38:57 -0700
>
>
> On 4/18/2013 9:33 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
> I would start with modeling a single vertical dipole.
>
> Actually, a simple quarter wave vertical is much easier to model, and is
> close to what he wants to build. And there's am example model of it with
> the simple version of EZNEC that comes on the CD with the ARRL Antenna
> Book. Besides -- vertical dipoles are not great antennas because their
> vertical patterns are poor for most uses.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|