Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Vertical antenna comparison.

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: [TowerTalk] Vertical antenna comparison.
From: Robert Serfas <x51bob@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Apr 2013 10:39:16 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Thinking about the discussion of vertical antennas and their performance, I 
have had this experience.
Bought an old Hygain trapped vertical a dozen years or so ago, have had it in 
two separate QTH's in the same city, both times , ground mounted over a radial 
field.
The vertical has worked well, running barefoot, only 100w, often performing 
better than various wire antennas, depending on skip distances and other 
seasonal variables.
Concerning trap losses, I feel they are miniscule as heard from the other end 
of the path, mostly, the traps limit bandwidth as a problem. I have had one 
experience with the Cushcraft R-5, that was on a special event station for 
lighthouse weekend, had the antenna mounted about 40 feet up on a lighthouse 
railing, no grounding or radials, worked tons of DX, one fella made his first 
HF DX contact into Katmandu on that set up, again, barefoot, phone. As the 
saying goes, ymmv!
I actually own that same R-5 though have not put it into use as of yet.
Lately, the Hygain has been giving me problems, it is out of tune and has high 
SWR, I suspect water in one of the traps, or a loose connection, I will pull it 
down when the WX gets better to have a look, maybe consider replacing it with 
the Cushcraft for a while.

Thanks for listening to my rant, and ideas, nice to be back on board.

Bob Serfas / N8PKN,
Marquette, MI.


Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>