Uhh ... the burden is NOT on me to substantiate any vendor's claims for
performance. It's on him, and until he does so, I will remain the
skeptic when I see things that have generally been debunked elsewhere,
such as the claim that a loop driven element significantly reduces
reception of man-made noise.
From http://www.g0ksc.co.uk/intro-lfa.html :
"Additionally, the close (sic) loop at the feedpoint deems the LFA less
susceptible to man-made noise and static."
73,
Dave AB7E
On 3/20/2013 11:13 AM, Joe Subich, W4TV wrote:
If these antennas have been so extensively modeled and optimized,
there should be a clear comparison available that would tell us
whether the difference warrants the hype.
Do just a little literature search for yourself rather than expect
that UPS will deliver a box of books customized for your skepticism.
There have been dozens of patterns posted on Justin's personal web
site over the last couple years as well as journals in the area and
web sites of other antenna developers. The data is out there but
nobody is going to spoon feed the skeptics.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|