I replaced a K2550 with a W3000. When cranking up, there is a considerable
increase in effort due to the friction of the worm drive. The additional
2:1 gear reduction of the W3000 approximately cancels this out. Cranking
down is probably less effort than the K2550, since there is no break
to fool with. I found it necessary to heavily lubricate the winch,
smothering the moving parts in grease. Unfortunately, it is difficult
to get the grease to really penetrate. The last time I used the W3000,
it started squeeking on the way up. This is apparently due to the
worm bushing spinning. The winch gets fairly hot in use; I don't
think it is designed for the kind of duty cycle involved with raising
a tower. I plan on replacing it with a boat lift winch (see:
http://www.w4abc.com/drive.html). These winches make the W3000
look like a toy. In your case, the W3000 may be
oversize for your tower (since it came with a K1550) and it
may work out for you better than it has for me.
Rick N6RK
Fredric T. Serota wrote:
> I replaced the K1550 on my US towers 55 ft crank over a few years ago with
> a K2550. Now it needs repair or replacement and I was thinking or using
> the KW3000 as an upgrade and because the handle would be in a much more
> convenient location, off the back of the tilt over fixture. (The 2550
> handle rubs the side of the tilt over fixture and is wearing the paint and
> baring the metal. Anyone have any experience with this winch and it
> suitability as a replacement?
>
> Fred, K3BHX
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|