Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical

To: "Hans Hammarquist" <hanslg@aol.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical
From: "Mark Robinson" <markrob@mindspring.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:16:31 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I read an article somewhere where the ham had some experimenting with the radiation angle of an elevated 1/4 wave vertical. As you raise the vertical you get lower radiation angles up to a point. Beyond that and then you start getting high radiation angles. If you are interested I can dig it out. A figure of 40 feet for a 40m 1/4 vertical comes to mind. After that any low angle advantage was lost.

I have a 30m vertical at 25 feet and am not convinced about it's performance yet.


73 Mark N1UK




----- Original Message ----- From: "Hans Hammarquist" <hanslg@aol.com>
To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 31 October, 2012 11:00 PM
Subject: [TowerTalk] 43 feet pole for vertical


I was wondering if someone has experience with a 43 foot vertical, mounted on top of a tower. I used one before on top of my roof, but that one was supported with simple guy wires. Needless to say that is not easy to do if I put it on top of my tower (85 feet tall). Any suggestion? Maybe it is a very stupid idea?


Hans - N2JFS
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>