Guess we weren't clear on the methodology. He tested several antennas
against the quad, by visiting each test antenna owner's station, and
reported how well each test antenna stacked up against his reference quad.
In the article, he ranked something like a half a dozen or so antennas,
thus tested, compared with each other, not necessarily with his quad.
One of y'all with a good library of QST, 73, CQ and Ham Radio should be
able to find it...
Don N7EF
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 7:17 AM, Michael Goins <wmgoins@gmail.com> wrote:
> No doubt a 6 el yagi won over a 2 el quad. Hard to imagine why it would
> not under any circumstance or conditions.
>
> Mike, k5wmg
> "Instead of wondering when your next vacation is, maybe you ought to set
> up a life you don't need to escape from."
>
>
> *
>
>
> *
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Big Don <bigdon39@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Back in the early 80's (?), article was published in one of the ham mags,
>> by well-known ham believe it was N6 (something). He had taken a 2-el quad
>> on a trailer crank-up, as his reference antenna, set it up a short
>> distance
>> from various stations he tested. Took DX sig readings on a reference rig
>> switching back/forth between his reference antenna and the station's
>> antenna being tested. IIRC, the winner of that study was 6-el KLM
>> monobander...
>>
>> Don N7EF
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Ward Silver <hwardsil@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > As K9YC and others observe, this is a highly non-trivial exercise and
>> > takes weeks. I just do not have the time for the undertaking. That's
>> > actually part of why we published the detailed protocol...so that some
>> > other motivated group could build on it. Another possibility is for
>> one of
>> > the big antenna or aerospace companies to make a test range available
>> for a
>> > day or two and have a large group do it like Field Day. But the writeup
>> > and data-crunching will still take many, many hours.[-SNIP-]
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|