I think that comment is an anachronism. The Telrex was a beefy antenna,
but with full size elements I don't see how it could be as mechanically
robust as a modern day coil-loaded shorty-40. Just too much weight and
leverage up there for the Telrex, and a properly designed shorty-40 will
not suffer very much in performance relative to a full size antenna.
Dave AB7E
On 5/24/2012 1:46 PM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
> Put up a Telrex if you want the strongest mechanically.
>
> Don
> N8DE
>
>
> Quoting lkeller73@roadrunner.com:
>
>> Hello out there.
>>
>> I'm at a loss as to what to replace a snow-damaged 2 el 40m beam with.
>>
>> Everything I've found on-line doesn't really call out how strong the
>> antenna is.
>>
>> Ideally, since most "gain" figures would be nebulous anyway, I want
>> the STRONGEST beam
>> out there since it's going on Bertha at 100 feet.
>>
>> Any suggestions?
>>
>> Lonnie
>> WA2AOG/W2RR
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|