To: | <DX-IS@yahoogroups.com>, <cq-contest@contesting.com>, <towertalk@contesting.com>, <antennaware@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [Antennaware] Full vs mini sized tribanders |
From: | "John Geiger" <aa5jg@fidmail.com> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Jan 2012 22:41:09 -0000 |
List-post: | <antennaware@contesting.com">mailto:antennaware@contesting.com> |
How do the mini sized 2 element tribanders like the Cushcraft MA5B and Mosley Mini 32 compare to a full sized 2 element like the Mosley TA32 and HyGain TH2? Do they give up much in performance when they reduce the element size? They have the same boom length as the full sized models-and the MA5B actually has a longer boom than the TA32 and TH2? I had a MA5B once and thought it did a pretty good job, and it was nice to get the WARC bands with it. 73s John AA5JG _______________________________________________ Antennaware mailing list Antennaware@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/antennaware |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?, Steve W3AHL |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] PL259 Insertion Loss?, Al Kozakiewicz |
Previous by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Fwd: Re: PL259 Insertion Loss?, vk3pa |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Full vs mini sized tribanders, n8de |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |