Tony,
I made some azimuth plot measurements on my hexbeam with various CM
choke arrangements, including "none":
http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/hexbeam/common_mode/
The most sensitive indicator of CM issues was the shape of the rearward
lobe. Although the effects on that web page look small, I should
emphasise that they will vary massively depending on the impedance of
the conducted CM path. If you happen to have a coax feedline which is an
electrical half-wave long (or multiples), and which is well grounded at
the shack end, the effect would be much much greater.
On the other hand, the requirements on choke impedance in this
application are not so demanding. The impedance looking into one half of
the beam is just a few tens of Ohms, so for a choke to be effective we
don't need the several thousand Ohms of CM impedance that we would in
some other applications. Take a look at the table at the bottom of this
page:
http://www.karinya.net/g3txq/chokes/
You'll see that with the worst-case feedline length, a choke resistance
of just above 1kOhm was sufficient to reduce the CM current to 30dB less
than that in a half-wave dipole leg; you'll also see that for some other
feedline lengths, no choke at all is needed to achieve the same result.
Finally, the same table also illustrates why reactive choke impedance is
undesirable and can actually *increase* CM current with some feedline
lengths.
73,
Steve G3TXQ
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|