Two thoughts on that:
1. I think that violates the prime directive...not recommended by the
manufacturer.
2. That constant movement back and forth eventually "eggs" out the
openings where the tower flexes the most, causing further "egging" since more
movement is allowed.
This has been my experience with both Heights and Universal towers.
By the way, I did guy an old Heights tower that was 64 feet with one set
of 3/16 guys. Just be sure if you do this to put something between the guy
grip and the tower (I used an old hose), otherwise galvanic action really
tears up the aluminum.
Bill K4XS/KH7XS
In a message dated 11/18/2011 3:22:39 P.M. Greenwich Standard Time,
w0jx@yahoo.com writes:
Has anyone out there successfully guyed a Universal aluminum tower? My
current configuration is 30 taper, 26 st, 26 taper, 22 st, 22 taper,
18 st, 18 taper, and 14 top. It has a huge monstrous concrete base. It is
80 feet total in height and nothing else in on the tower. I had a TH6 on it
for 12 years with no problems but just replaced that with a TH-11 (a
fantastic antennas BTW) which has a 12 sq. ft wind load, considerably more
than
the TH6. With high winds, it moves around quite a bit and I am
uncomfortable with that. I am thinking of putting two sets of guys on it to
stabilize
the movement without shifting a lot of the load to the guys. The tower is
protected in most directions by mature trees that are taller than the tower
and that break the force of the wind quite a bit.
I have seen these towers with a set of rope guys at the top to minimize
the swaying but I think it was done without any real thought to it.
73, Dennis W0JX/8
Milan, OH
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|