Hi Don,
That being the case, so does the diminished "footprint" required of a DE vs. a
RE design...correct?
~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
************************************************************************************************************************
On 2011-08-25, at 12:11 PM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
> The question asked was why was DE-Refl preferred. The 0.1 dB loss in gain
> compared to 5-10 dB F/B makes a difference worth thinking about.
> 73
> Don
> N8DE
>
> Quoting Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>:
>
>> Hi Don,
>>
>> True enough, but the forward GAIN is less...
>>
>> ~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ
>>
>>
>> *************************************************************************************************************************
>>
>>
>> On 2011-08-25, at 11:53 AM, n8de@thepoint.net wrote:
>>
>>> DE-Reflector arrays have better front/back ratios.
>>> 73
>>> Don
>>> N8DE
>>>
>>>
>>> Quoting John Harper <john@ae5x.com>:
>>>
>>>> Most 2-element Yagis and quads use a reflector as the 2nd element.
>>>> I'm wondering what (if any) advantages a reflector has over a
>>>> director as the parasitic element for 2-element Yagi/quad designs.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> John AE5X
>>>> http://www.ae5x.com/blog
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|