Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Tuner

To: K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Remote Tuner
From: Jim Miller <jim@jtmiller.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 23:15:32 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Take a look at Kevin Schmidt's (W9CF) paper (
http://fermi.la.asu.edu/w9cf/articles/balun.pdf ) and you might decide that
4:1 transformations are less useful than a common mode choke with
sufficiently high impedence. Check out Jim Brown's (K9YC) paper for
implementation details http://www.audiosystemsgroup.com/RFI-Ham.pdf .

Jim ab3cv

On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 10:01 PM, K8RI on TT <k8ri-on-towertalk@tm.net>wrote:

> Most of the tuners I see today use a 4:1 Balun to go from unbalanced to
> balanced.
> For a remote tuner wouldn't it make more sense and be more efficient to
> use  a tapped coil, probably in a "T" arrangement and no balun to the
> open wire?
>
> IOW run the coax up the tower to the remote tuner. Tap the coax across a
> coil (rotary inductor) and use variable L and C to get a match to the
> balanced line?
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>


-- 
90g Planted Tank Blog <http://www.jtmiller.com/wordpress>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>