To: | <richard@karlquist.com>, <k0rc@citlink.net> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 63 |
From: | "Gary Schafer" <garyschafer@comcast.net> |
Reply-to: | garyschafer@comcast.net |
Date: | Sun, 24 Apr 2011 21:11:02 -0400 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
Rick, How did you feed the 1/2 wave vertical. From the center or the bottom? 73 Gary K4FMX > -----Original Message----- > From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk- > bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Rick Karlquist > Sent: Sunday, April 24, 2011 7:21 PM > > It is difficult to feed a vertical dipole in the traditional > way in the center without the feedline affecting the pattern. > It is also tricky to feed it from the bottom, as a half wave > vertical. I did some direct A/B tests comparing a 1/4 wave > vertical to a 1/2 wave vertical on 20 meters. They were > virtually indisinguishable, with maybe a slight edge going > to the 1/2 wave vertical. You can call that a vertical dipole > if you want. It had no radials by the way, while the 1/4 wave > vertical had 32 1/4 wave radials. YMMV. > > Rick N6RK > > _______________________________________________ > > > > _______________________________________________ > TowerTalk mailing list > TowerTalk@contesting.com > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] slightly OT - Wattmeter suggestion?, john |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 63, Jim Brown |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 63, Gene Fuller |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] TowerTalk Digest, Vol 100, Issue 63, Richard (Rick) Karlquist |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |