Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] OT ?? - Manual tuners
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:32:55 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
> In general, the most efficient setting for a T-Network tuner is the one 
> that makes it looks
> as close to an L-Network as possible.

I've noticed the same result and my primary ATU is a remote-controlled 
switchable "L."  Also component Q and total output C makes a substantial 
difference with C-L-C "T" tuners when low Z terminations are used.  A while 
back, I was very much fixated on high output C from a T tuner to achieve 
reasonable efficiency with low Z loads.  But as I began experimenting with 
EZNEC and transmission line simulator software, a multiband dipole or loop 
for a half-wave length (or more) at the lowest operating frequency will 
never plague you with anywhere near those low-Z loads.

OTOH, anyone planning on using physically short antennas, needs to be 
mindful of component Q and C values.  Myself, I would try to stay away from 
physically short antennas, absent a mobile antenna installation.  And so, 
most tuners are adequate when full-size multiband wire antennas are used.

Paul, W9AC 

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>