To: | <RLVZ@aol.com>, <TowerTalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance |
From: | n6rk@sonic.net |
Reply-to: | n6rk@sonic.net |
Date: | Sat, 11 Sep 2010 15:59:05 -0700 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
I went to a lot of trouble to put up an 80 meter dipole at 55 feet, thinking it would work better than an inverted vee. In terms of DX pileups, both antennas were poor performing cloud warmers. When you get up to a substantial height like 100 feet, the dipole will have more rejection off the ends and may receive a little better. It will then be able to compare to a good vertical for transmit purposes. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
Previous by Date: | [TowerTalk] HG-52SS, Barrie Smith |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] Reradiated Noise from Delta Loop, Robert Harmon |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance, DF3KV |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] 80-m. Inverted Vee vs. Dipole Performance, RLVZ |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |