Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Minimum Discernible Difference
From: "Roger (K8RI)" <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 01:54:33 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>

On 8/23/2010 5:31 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
> Creeping senility is such an ugly thing ....
>
> While working outside on a project I realized I had referred to K9YC as
> Gary, when everyone (including me) knows his name is Jim.  My sincere
> apologies ...

Tis qute alright Sam!.

73

Roger (K8RI)
> 73,
> Dave   AB7E
>
>
>
> On 8/23/2010 1:12 PM, David Gilbert wrote:
>> Thanks for the feedback, Rick ... good comments.  I wasn't really trying
>> to simulate what happens in a receiver, though, because there is no way
>> I can account for all the various receiver characteristics of AGC
>> threshold and non-linearity.  I own an Elecraft K3 that has a very wide
>> range of possible settings, and I know from personal experience that it
>> is possible to make multiple weak signals virtually unintelligible if I
>> try hard enough.
>>
>> Based upon your comments and those from Gary, K9YC, though, I think I
>> will go back to the original .wav files and remix them, then feed them
>> into my backup rig (756Pro) with it transmitting into a dummy load.  I
>> can then record the result as received by my Elecraft K3 to see if the
>> results are significantly different than what I already have.   I'll
>> give it a try with and without mixed background noise and see how it works.
>>
>> Thanks es 73,
>> Dave   AB7E
>>
>>
>>
>> On 8/23/2010 11:43 AM, Rick Karlquist wrote:
>>> The intent of these tests is good.  It is always good
>>> to get confirmation that a 2 dB difference in S/N
>>> is significant.  That's why I run 150W in low power
>>> contests instead of 100W, if the rules permit.
>>>
>>> There is some question as to the validity of your
>>> experiments.  It sounds like you added perfect audio
>>> tones to receiver background noise.  This isn't
>>> necessarily equivalent to actually receiving signals
>>> through the receiver.  The receiver could have some
>>> nonlinearity and the receive filter could have some
>>> ringing.
>>>
>>> Rick N6RK
>>>
>>>
>>> David Gilbert wrote:
>>>> I've added a page to my web site covering some investigations into how
>>>> much difference in signal strength might be noticeable in weak signal
>>>> and/or contest conditions, with several audio files included as
>>>> illustration.  Please don't consider any of it to be authoritative since
>>>> I am not an audio professional, but maybe some of it will be useful to
>>>> someone.  If anyone has suggestions for different comparisons, please
>>>> let me know.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.ab7e.com/weak_signal/mdd.html
>>>>
>>>> 73,
>>>> Dave   AB7E
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TowerTalk mailing list
>>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>