I've always thought this as well, but others have claimed this is not
true. Can anyone explain why this is the case?
Yes, my anecdotal evidence supports this. I've done side-by-side
comparisons of a 40m vertical dipole against a horizontal dipole and
always found QRN to be higher on the vertical. I just don't
understand why this is the case.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:12 PM, Roger (K8RI) <K8RI-on-TowerTalk@tm.net> wrote:
>
>
> On 7/2/2010 12:51 PM, Kelly Johnson wrote:
>> A co-worker asked me today why hams use horizontally polarized yagi's
>> instead of vertically polarized. Am I correct that it has to do with
>> ground reflection gain?
>>
>
> All these answers and not one mentioned that on low bands, at least the
> QRN is predominately vertically polarized and using a horizontally
> polarized antenna means listening to less QRN although at times it seems
> difficult to believe when operating 75 or 40 in the summer.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|