On 7/2/2010 1:59 PM, Jim Thomson wrote:
> I keep seeing the odd ref on some other sites to LMR-900UF
>
> I even saw it on the online power calculator/attenuation calculator on the
> times site.
>
> But it's not listed on the Times microwave site any where else but the on
> line calculator.
>
> On a lot of wireless sites/wi-fi etc... they have complete attenuation /power
> tables for LMR cables
>
> and in each one of em, LMR-900UF is listed right before the regular LMR-900.
>
> The LMR-900UF specs they depict are typ [ if it exists] IE: slightly more
> attenuation then reg 900
> and slightly less power handling capability etc.
>
> Does this LMR-900UF actually exist?? If it does, it would be the real
> ticket.. and I have several applications
> where it could easily be deployed. The rigid LMR-900 and also LMR-1200DB
> is NO fun to work with at all.
>
>
Nor are the UF versions when making a lot of connections. The jacket is
a rubber like material that does not adhere to the braid. This makes the
use of regular strippers problematic at best and useless at worst. Well,
actually I've had the jacket tare which meant cutting off the end and
starting over.
I am a fan of the LMR series cables, but I am not a fan of the UF
versions. The jacket is not only difficult to work with, but has a
relatively short life compared to the regular LMR cables or Davis
BuryFlex(TM). I had to replace all of the pigtails to the antennas in
the big array after less than 8 years.
> If it doesn't exist, then they should consider making such a product. Does
> anybody know ?
>
>
73
Roger (K8RI)
> Later... Jim VE7RF
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|