I too agree that PL type connectors are fine at HF.
Speaking of junk connectors; I used the MFJ 259B to try and measure a new
dummy load up thru 2 meters. A PL to N adaptor was used at the MFJ as the
load had an N connector. The return loss (SWR) was fine at HF but at 2
meters it did not look too flat. I discovered that the PL to N adaptor was
an off brand one. I replaced it with an amphenol and the return loss was
much better at 2 meters.
73
Gary K4FMX
> -----Original Message-----
> From: towertalk-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:towertalk-
> bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Brown
> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 6:18 PM
> To: Tower and HF antenna construction topics.
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Coax
>
> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 17:26:12 -0400, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>
> >UHF connectors on HF have so little loss you'd never know they are
> there.
>
> Yup. I recently made up 1100 ft of very low loss RG8 in 100 ft lengths
> for the Iraq DXpedition. I measured their loss in series up to 500 MHz.
> That's 22 PL259s and 10 barrels. All real Amphenols, properly soldered,
> and real Amphenol barrels, not junk connectors. The loss at 500 MHz was
> slightly LESS than the mfr's spec for that length of cable at 500 MHz.
>
> The potential issue with PL259s is a MINOR impedance discontinuity that
> can cause a SMALL reflection at HIGH UHF. Think about it -- what's the
> wavelength at 1 GHz? How long is the connector?
>
> Martin said:
>
> "I take my information from many articles that I have read"
>
> Like I said, actual measurements, not folklore. I'd bet that those
> articles are repeating articles that their authors have read. The
> historian and journalist Gene Lees wrote a long essay debunking the
> false story in a newspaper saying that Dizzy Gillespie had a drinking
> problem. Lees had known Gillespie and many of his friends for decades,
> and knew that he had always been a teetotaler, but this single newspaper
> story was picked up and quoted, and those quotes quoted, and that sloppy
> journalism became accepted as fact.
>
> Your time would be far better spent studying the fundamentals of how
> transmission lines work in the ARRL Handbook or Antenna Book. And we
> would all be better off if folks would not quote folklore as fact.
>
> 73,
>
> Jim Brown K9YC
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|