Kurt Cathcart, KR2C wrote:
> Does anybody have any opinions on RFC400. It's touted as an equivalent to
> LMR400.
>
>
I've used the CNT or Andrews equivelant, but never the RFC400. I'm
always a bit leery of "equivalent" cables until some one actually tests
them. By that I mean tested when new and periodically for some time
after that. I've never had a bad piece of LMR cable although I've found
the the UF versions to have a rather fragile jacket that does not take
well to abuse. OTOH I've heard others complain.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> -Kurt
> KR2C
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|