To: | "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the Fractal Design in Ham Antennas |
From: | "Richard (Rick) Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com> |
Reply-to: | "Tower and HF antenna construction topics." <towertalk@contesting.com> |
Date: | Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:12:25 -0800 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
jimlux wrote: > > > Limited commercial viability (e.g. no big advantage over other shortened > antenna designs, so a lot more marketing sizzle than steak) and a patent > owner (Nathan Cohen) rumored to be litigious to boot. > > fractenna.com Reminds me of the Cuk inductorless switching power supply. It certainly represented out of the box thinking and maybe had some advantages over other supplies in certain applications. However, it was patented and I guess the licensing was onerous so it never saw much use. The patent is now expired but it still hasn't been adopted. Rick N6RK _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] Why time delay on UST MDPL?, ny9h |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TowerTalk] C-19XR or Skyhawk, ac9s |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the Fractal Design in Ham Antennas, jimlux |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] What happened to the Fractal Design in Ham Antennas, Roger (K8RI) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |